校內行政
 
二零一/一六學年校本課後學習及支援計
校本津 - 活動計劃表
學校名稱 :
五旬節林漢光中學
計劃統籌員姓名 :
何樞熾老師
聯絡電話 :
2648 8291
A. 本計劃受惠學生人數(人頭)預計共56(包括A. 領取綜援人數:21名,B. 學生資助計劃全額津貼人數:21C. 學校使用25%酌情權的清貧學生人數14)
B. 獲本津貼資助/補足的各項活動資料
預計參加合資格學
人數#
*
活動名稱/類別
活動目標
評估方法
(例如:測試、問卷等
)
活動舉辦時期
/ 日期
A
B
預計開支
($)
合辦機構/服務供應
機構名稱
(如適用)
A1個人成長計劃
(中三及中四級)
以課後小組形式,提升學習能力稍
遜者的社交和溝通技巧
問卷及活動表現
20159月至
20166
3
3
2
4000
A2
高中拔尖保底課
以課後拔尖保底班形式,提升高中
學生各科的成績
問卷及活動表現
20159月至
20166
9
9
6
12000
A3暑期計劃
(中二及中四級)
透過多元化活動,包括功課輔導、
歷奇活動、溝通技巧訓練,幫助有
需要學生全發展,建立自信。
問卷及活動表現
20159月至
20166
9
9
6
12000
學生人次
21
21
14
活動
項目總數:___3__
__
**總學生
人次
56
28000
備註:
*活動名稱/類別如下:功課輔導、學習技巧訓練、語文訓練、參觀/外活動、文化藝術、體育活動、自信心訓練、義工服務、歷奇活動、領袖訓練及社交/溝通技巧訓練
@學生人次:上列參加各項活動的受惠學生人數的總和
**總學生人次:指 (A) + (B) + (C) 的總和
# 合資格學生: 指領取綜援/學生資助計劃全額津貼及學校使用25%酌情權的清貧學生.
School-based After-school Learning and Support Programmes 2015/16 s.y.
School-based Grant - Programme Report
Name of School: Pentecostal Lam Hong Kwong School
Project Coordinator: Mr.Ho Shu Chee Contact Telephone No.: 26428252
A. The number of students (count by heads) benefitted under this programme is 29 (including A. 6 CSSA recipients, B. 11 SFAS full-grant
recipients and C. 12 under school’s discretionary quota).
B. Information on Activities under the Programme
Actual no. of
participating
eligible
students
#
*Name / Type of activity
A
B
C
Average
attendance
rate
Period/Date
activity held
Actual expenses
($)
Method(s) of evaluation
(e.g. test, questionnaire, etc)
Name of partner/
service provider
(if applicable)
Remarks if any
(e.g. students’ learning
and affective outcome)
A1 Personal development
programs (S3-S4)
6
7
7
80%
9/2015-1/2016
4000
Evaluation meeting
Teen行者
/
A2 Senior form
enhancement & remedial
programs
/
/
1
90%
9/2015-1/2016
500
Evaluation meeting
/
/
A3 Summer programs
(S2 & S4)
/
4
4
90%
7/2016-8/2016
4800
Evaluation meeting
Yes Power
/
Total no. of activities:
___3__
@No. of man-times
6
11
12
**Total no. of man-times
29
Total Expenses
9300
C. Project Effectiveness
In general, how would you rate the achievements of the activities conducted to the benefitted
eligible students?
Improved
Please put a “” against the most appropriate box.
Significant
Moderate
Slight
No
Change
Declining
Not
Applicable
Learning Effectiveness
a)
Students’ motivation for learning
b)
Students’ study skills
c)
Students’ academic achievement
d)
Students’ learning experience outside classroom
e)
Your overall view on students’ learning effectiveness
Personal and Social Development
f)
Students’ self-esteem
g)
Students’ self-management skills
h)
Students’ social skills
i)
Students’ interpersonal skills
j)
Students’ cooperativeness with others
k)
Students’ attitudes toward schooling
l)
Students’ outlook on life
m)
Your overall view on students’ personal and social
development
Community Involvement
n)
Students’ participation in extracurricular and voluntary
activities
o)
Students’ sense of belonging
p)
Students’ understanding on the community
q)
Your overall view on students’ community
involvement
D. Comments on the project conducted
Problems/difficulties encountered when implementing the project
(You may tick more than one box)
unable to identify the eligible students (i.e., students receiving CSSA, SFAS full grant);
difficult to select suitable non-eligible students to fill the discretionary quota;
eligible students unwilling to join the programmes;
the quality of service provided by partner/service provider not satisfactory;
tutors inexperienced and student management skills unsatisfactory;
the amount of administrative work leads to apparent increase on teachers’ workload;
complicated to fulfill the requirements for handling funds disbursed by EDB;
the reporting requirements too complicated and time-consuming;
Others (Please specify):
E. Do you have any feedback from students and their parents? Are they
satisfied with the service provided? (optional)
/